EXCLUSIVE: Enes Kanter Freedom is demanding answers from the WNBA after security removed him from his courtside seat during Sunday’s game between the Chicago Sky and Indiana Fever at Wintrust Arena.
Freedom attended the game wearing a shirt advocating for the protection of women’s sports, days after announcing his intention to enter the WNBA Draft as a form of protest. During the third quarter, Sky guard Natasha Cloud crossed the court and confronted Freedom as he sat near the baseline.
In a letter sent to WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert, Freedom requested an explanation for his removal and accused the league of applying its policies selectively.
Freedom called the ejection an “apparent selective enforcement of League and arena policies that raises serious concerns of viewpoint discrimination,” according to the letter obtained by OutKick.
The former NBA first-round pick also disputed claims from Chicago Sky co-owner Nadia Rawlinson and nearby spectators that he instigated the confrontation with Cloud.
“Late in the third quarter, Chicago Sky player Natasha Cloud turned from the court, approached my seat, and began yelling, cursing, and pointing in my direction,” Freedom wrote. “Security and Sky personnel intervened, and I was subsequently escorted from the arena.”
Freedom argued that the league appeared to apply a double standard because Cloud had not been publicly reprimanded or punished for her actions.
SKY COACH PRAISES NATASHA CLOUD AFTER HEATED VERBAL ALTERCATION WITH ENES KANTER FREEDOM
“According to the WNBA, any physical or verbal altercation with a fan is treated as conduct detrimental to the game,” Freedom wrote. “The WNBA Office holds the authority to issue heavy fines or multi-game suspensions for players who cross the line into berating or cursing at spectators. Yet Ms. Cloud’s conduct of yelling, swearing, and pointing at a spectator (me) appears to have escaped any accountability and was, in fact, defended by her coach.”
Freedom also disputed the contention that his own conduct warranted removal from the arena.
“Meanwhile, I remained fully aware that I could not step onto the court and ensured my presence and expression complied with applicable standards,” the letter states. “In other words, I followed your rules.”
Freedom further argued that security failed to follow the WNBA’s stated process for addressing alleged fan misconduct.
WNBA ADMITS SECURITY IN ATLANTA WAS WRONG TO MAKE FANS COVER SHIRTS AT DREAM-FEVER GAME
“According to the WNBA Fan Code of Conduct, a spectator should be issued a warning for any alleged violation before being forced to leave the game,” Freedom wrote. “I received no such warning prior to my ejection.”
The letter repeatedly alleged that Freedom received unfair treatment because of his public advocacy and the message displayed on his shirt.
“The circumstances of my removal only further highlight a pattern and practice of the League applying its rules unfairly,” Freedom wrote. “For example, why did arena personnel believe my ejection was warranted while Ms. Cloud appears to have escaped any accountability for clearly violating League rules against the use of profanity and insults directed at fans?”
Freedom specifically questioned whether his advocacy “for defending the integrity of women’s sports” or his announcement that he intended to enter the WNBA Draft played a role in the decision.
“I should not be treated differently because the League, its players, or personnel disagree with my viewpoint,” Freedom wrote. “The timing and circumstances of my removal beg a variety of questions: Did my WNBA Draft announcement, prior communications with the League, public advocacy for women’s sports, or the message displayed on my shirt play a role in the decision to eject me?”
Freedom also connected his removal to other recent controversies involving spectators who expressed opposition to allowing transgender athletes to compete in women’s sports.
“On July 28, spectators outside the Seattle Storm v. Indiana Fever game were treated differently based on their viewpoints,” Freedom wrote. “While supporters of women’s sports were told they could not rally on the raised platform outside the arena, transgender activists were allowed to do so.”
“Next, on August 16, spectators at an Atlanta Dream v. Indiana Fever game were instructed to cover shirts supporting women’s sports that were like mine, while allowing pro-transgender shirts to remain. Although the WNBA subsequently acknowledged that the intervention ‘should not have happened,’ it was no more than a week later that I was removed from the August 23 WNBA game wearing a shirt expressing a similar viewpoint.”
Freedom argued that those incidents “raise significant questions about the WNBA’s application of its own rules depending on the perceived viewpoints of its spectators.”
“It goes without saying that when I purchase a ticket to attend a WNBA game, I expect that I will not be discriminated against based on my viewpoint,” Freedom wrote.
Freedom requested “a written response within five business days” addressing five specific demands:
“1. Identify the policy, rule, directive, or instruction relied upon in treating certain spectators, including me, differently when we express a viewpoint that appears unpopular with the WNBA;
“2. Identify whether the decision to eject me was made or requested by WNBA personnel, Chicago Sky personnel, Wintrust Arena personnel, security personnel, or another individual or entity;
“3. Confirm whether Ms. Cloud’s conduct has been or will be reviewed under any League policy governing player interactions with fans, including rules governing altercations that require player suspension, and state what accountability, if any, she, her team, and management will face;
“4. Provide a full refund of the cost of my courtside tickets; and
“5. Preserve all materials relating to this incident, including relevant video footage, incident or security reports, communications concerning my attendance or removal, communications referring to my WNBA Draft announcement or public advocacy for women’s sports, and any applicable policies or event-day directives.”
Freedom concluded the letter by warning that the controversy would not be resolved without a clear explanation from the league.
STAY “FEARLESS” ON THE GO! TAKE TOMI LAHREN WITH YOU. DOWNLOAD THE TLIF PODCAST NOW!
“The pattern of viewpoint discrimination against those, like me, who advocate for the protection of women and integrity of women’s sports has created a real and substantial conflict that must be addressed,” Freedom wrote.
The letter now puts the decision directly before Engelbert and WNBA leadership. Freedom is asking the league to identify who ordered his removal, explain the rule he allegedly violated and determine whether Cloud’s conduct merits a formal review. Until the league responds, the circumstances surrounding his ejection — and whether his political advocacy played any role in it — remain disputed.
The Sky and WNBA have not responded to a request for comment on Freedom’s letter.
